Tuesday, February 9, 2010

RPattz is mentioned in E! News’ Ted Casablanca’s Bitch Back Column

Dear Ted:
I heard from a friend who works at the Sundance Institute that the reason for the lack of info about Kristen Stewart’s next movie was because she had tested for the role of Suzanne in Bel Ami while in the U.K. but had not been successful. Holly Grainger, who was in Bad Mother’s Handbook with Rob, got the role. It would have guaranteed her being around Rob, but it didn’t work out, and it would have been embarrassing for her if it were known. Is there any truth in this? Coming on top of being nominated as worst screen couple, it would have been a little embarrassing. Is this just a story, or is there any truth in it?
—Sue

Dear Hearsay:
Well, aren’t you the little gossip columnist in training? Kristen is doing just fine. Better than her BF, professionally speaking (range-wise), if you ask me.

Dear Ted:
I’m happy Rob and Kristen are doing their own things. Love isn’t love without breathing room and personal growth. How much do you think the Twi stuff affects each of them, and has it been mostly negative or positive?
—Barrett


Dear Repercussions:
At the end of the day, R.Pattz and K.Stew love what they do, which makes fame (and all the crap that goes with it) worth it to them. That’s also why they know when it’s time to be career-focused and not solely focused on each other. It’s smart. They’re smart! This is totally why they have their cool relationship down pat.
source

No comments:

Post a Comment